Soma & Heraclitus: It's time to unplug
We gotta git off the Soma folks.
Heraclitus of Ephesus held up a fine idea: A man possessed of wisdom has two main thangs to git done: figger out the content of important thangs an' then to name it right. Thas' philosopher speak fer "call it like it is".
Truth must be linked to something that has real, askshul existence in the world external to the mind of the thinker.
Y'all git that?
It means, the fantasy of the wishful thinkin' in yore haid doan qualify as "reality."
TO name somethin' rightly is to name it so that the external real CONTENT of the thang is conveyed. So--thinkin' deeply here--when the name or phrase for somethin' ain't named rightly, y'all can be dern sure thar's a reason somebody is obfuscatin' the real ackshul contents of the thang. Mostly, namin' wrongly so the name doan match the contents is obfuscatin' an' it is done cause iffin' the truth of it were said plain, some folks would NOT go along wif' it. Hence, obfuscatin' has become a 21st century art form.
The whole purpose of language is to order thangs accordin' to reality, then communicate that ordered reality. So when words is used to cause DELIBERATE disorder, wrong communication about a reality, all of mankind is abused.
Aunty will say straight out that at least one of the thangs that youse gonna read next is likely to run a thrill up yore leg, but not in a good way. I know some of these thangs is gonna raise some ire wif one or two of ya--but relax, I ain't meanin' to discuss the rightness or wrongness of none of 'em...mah point is to simply list a few of the more blatant obfuscatin' terms in common use by the mind controllers (spin doctors) .
It mayhap youse in agreement wif' the real content of the obfuscation, but ya might not think it ethical to resort to obfuscation--I is askin' ya' WHY NOT JES' SAY IT STRAIGHT OUT if youse in favor of it, jes' name it rightly.
Here is an example:
If you assist in killing somebody, youse a murderer. "Assisted suicide" takes advantage of a person who is vulnerable, in pain and or depressed. Less youse paralyzed, it doan take no hep to kill yoreself. Ya can swig some household cleaners and be done wif it. Most folks who are victims of the obfuscation of "assisted suicide" din't think it up themselves--no no no...somebody who "felt their pain" made the suggestion. In some countries they's seekin' to make laws that say a child has a "right" to assisted suicide "services" when he /she is 13 years old. No pathology need be present--no cancer or deformity, it can be as paltry as the kid is depressed because he din't make the soccer team.
This lie is intended to make you feel good about bestowing an unearned postion on an unqualified person. It devalues the opportunity such that it has little meaning. Now we have lawsuits whar' students sue schools because they cain't read! The student's degree or diploma doan mean he/she ackshully has marketable skills, jes a worthless "degree." "Equal opportunity is an obfuscation for "social engineering."
"Partner" (non-bidness, any orientation)
This is an obfuscation for fornication. If ya' is okay wif blatant sex outside the bond of marriage, doan try to pretty it up none--jes' be proud an' say it plain. Fornication is a perfectly descriptive word that means sex without marriage, as in, "Yeah, it's been ages since I seen y'all. Lemme introduce ya' to my fornicator, Tiffany."
(is that harsh? Okay, well I ain't meanin' them folks who is in full hanky panky mode but who is engaged and really will marry-up. I'se talkin' serial "partnering" year after year wif no intent to ever do right by any "partner", jes' use, abuse and move on sorta thang.)
"Freedom of choice"
This smarmy little phrase doan mean "hold the mustard, double the onion." That "choice" means takin' the life of a defenseless baby because the woman is pressured into it, thinks she has no one to help or wants to pursue other plans for her life. Doan fool around wif' that "blob of tissue" obfuscation either. The baby has a heartbeat at 17 days--afore the lady knows she's missed a cycle. Ever'body knows the "tissue" is no threat unless it is a baby. So name it out plain, "abortion." (Aunty has a soft heart fer ladies who has had abortions. I ain't moralizin' here a'tall. Not one iota. I is sayin' that we as a culture need to state plainly what this is--killing a child. When we say it plain, fewer women will be shoved and pressured into making this decison because she is lulled into thinkin' it is a "blob of tissue.")
MY main ire on "freedom of choice" is wif' politicans and the billion dollar abortion industry. Think now--can we use "freedom of choice" iffin' I put a pillow over Uncle's face while he sleeps an' snuff him out? Why not? Cause--fer now--UNcle still has an advocate in the law, an' we took that from babies. But watch out as the elderly become as inconvenient as an unplanned chile--soon "Duty to die" will be the new global warming hysteria.
This is a scary newologism. It is used whar' they mean to tell you that doan worry iffin' yore rights is abridged, the "managers" is on yore side. It ackshully means soft creeping incremental tyranny, the elite control of the masses. Thus a universal healthcare will not deprive you of yore own doctors or preferences, oh no! It will be a new improved system of "managed freedom."
"Health and Reproductive Rights"
Sounds like someone finally coming to the aid of the poor Chinese folks whose gubmint is even now imposing more draconian laws to enforce the one child policy. Nope.
This nifty bit of obfuscation means exactly the opposite. It is U.N. speak fer forced contraception and forced abortions. Norplant shot into the arms of unsuspectin' Indian women in PEru and Ecuador. Free "clinics" in Colombia whar' women is given exams and IUDs are set without their knowledge or consent. See, at the U.N. pregnancy is a disease. So "health" is anti-pregnancy, and "reporductive rights" doan mean the right to reproduce, but the "right" to NEVER reproduce --particularly the populations that need "management."
The U.N. and other globalists doan want more'n about 2 billion people on this earth. Their plan calls fer 3/4 of that number to be serfs. The rest is management and potentates.
A shiny polished spin jinned up ny Marixist Saul Alinsky that refers to using gangs and aggreived people for poltical extortion and personal gain. Synonymous these days wif' Acorn and Obamanation.
Whar' does all this doublspeak obfuscation take ya'? Somebody already seen all this comin' long afore Aunty was in bloomers:
"It seems to me that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: That we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude. This is the, it seems to me, the ultimate in malevolent revolutions shall we say, and this is a problem which has interested me many years and about which I wrote thirty years ago, a fable, Brave New World, which is an account of society making use of all the devices available and some of the devices which I imagined to be possible making use of them in order to, first of all, to standardize the population, to iron out inconvenient human differences, to create, to say, mass produced models of human beings arranged in some sort of scientific caste system. Since then, I have continued to be extremely interested in this problem and I have noticed with increasing dismay a number of the predictions which were purely fantastic when I made them thirty years ago have come true or seem in process of coming true.
A number of techniques about which I talked seem to be here already. And there seems to be a general movement in the direction of this kind of ultimate revolution, a method of control by which a people can be made to enjoy a state of affairs by which any decent standard they ought not to enjoy. This, the enjoyment of servitude, Well this process is, as I say, has gone on for over the years, and I have become more and more interested in what is happening."
----Aldous Huxley at Berkeley 1962
You have to understand that most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many are so hopelessly dependent on the system, they will fight to defend it".
-------Morpheus to Neo