Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts

7.08.2008

We ARE Winning the War in Iraq

From newspapers in the United Kingdom we learn:

"Al-Qaeda and the Taleban are in retreat, the surge has worked in Iraq and Islamism is discredited. Not a bad haul" (read story)



Why ya' reckon CNN and the rest of the traitor media doan tell us this ???

[Hat tip to Stogie at Saberpoint]

American and Iraqi forces are driving Al-Qaeda in Iraq out of its last redoubt in the north of the country in the culmination of one of the most spectacular victories of the war on terror.

After being forced from its strongholds in the west and centre of Iraq in the past two years, Al-Qaeda’s dwindling band of fighters has made a defiant “last stand” in the northern city of Mosul.

Read the rest HERE

Folks, whatever our views on the war may be, we ought to revolt against news media who flatly fail to do their job--report then news, editorialize else' whar'. All ya'll liberals, doan ya' care that censorship is thrown over ya like a hood?

Here are some thangs to keep in mind:

1. The "war on Islamists" is OLD. It predates our nationhood. President Tom Jefferson battled the infidel in Africa ...AND engaged in "regime change" by unseating one pirate thug brother and installin' another more favorable to our vision of freedom. GWB did not start this thang.

2. Jimmy Carter was such a wimpy-butted slacker that his wishy-washy policies INVITED the Islamic bullies to take a swipe at us--an' they did. (That was in the 70's ya'll)

3. Clinton admits he did not handle Al-Queda and OBL correctly--in other words, he failed us as commander in chief--failed to protect us, an' THAT is why we had 9-11.

4. FOR TEN YEARS (since Gulf War I) the UNITED NATIONS insisted that Saddam had WMD in Iraq--thas' right folks...GWB did not invent or make up the idea of Saddam's WMD. The info was already held by the UN. (Full disclosure: Aunty's work is often in bowel of the East River Beast (UN). )

5. I'se cool wif' folks who thaink that the war was ill advised--mebbe that case can be made. I can roll wif' that. But mah gut says the trouble is NOT an ill advised war, but a war too tentatively engaged. Try not to go to war, but iffin' ya goes--git the job DONE ASAP. No kitty-footin' around.

6. This is a war that ain't goin' away. We cannot make "peace" wif Islam. We would like to-but they ain't havin' it.

They see their salvation as conversion of all ya'll--by force iffin' they have to. They started this war LONG before the ground was poked and oil came out.

The war is NOT ABOUT OIL. (yes, there is a war for oil--and economic and geopolitical diplomatic war over oil...but sports fans, even if that were resolved, the Islamists is STILL COMIN' fer ya'! ) For Islam, oil is a tool to use, not the goal. The goal is to submit every human to Allah and Sharia law.


Sooner or later, the West will have to deal wif this reality. People who pretend tha' CNN can make the war go away or Obama can make it go away is guilty of criminal negligence against they families and they chillen's.

I'se good wif the truth that we can disagree about the HOW --but people, please, fer mercy sake, we gotta git it together: This is a battle we must engage and win.

6.04.2008

Human Rights--Whata Horror


In Canada there has a been the most grievous violation of human rights. Naw, nobody was poison gassed, and nobody was beheaded, nobody raped, nobody was stoned ter death nor no daddy slaughtered his baby girls fer dishonorin' daddy....naw, naw, them's minor cirmes ya know...I'se talkin' about a B I G HORROR! The horror of --you guessed it--free speech.

A fella wrote an article in which he said Islam was set to win the mind bendin' war on the West. Can ya'll imagine such a horrific thang to say? What was Mark Steyn thinkin' to write what ever'body worries about: “The Future Belongs to Islam.”

Fer Pete's sake, how dense can a fella be? Din't he know the media will bludgeon ya speakin' this truth:

Let's start with demography, because everything does:

If your school has 200 guys and you're playing a school with 2,000 pupils, it doesn't mean your baseball team is definitely going to lose but it certainly gives the other fellows a big starting advantage. Likewise, if you want to launch a revolution, it's not very likely if you've only got seven revolutionaries. And they're all over 80. But, if you've got two million and seven revolutionaries and they're all under 30 you're in business.

For example, I wonder how many pontificators on the "Middle East peace process" ever run this number:

The median age in the Gaza Strip is 15.8 years.

Once you know that, all the rest is details. If you were a "moderate Palestinian" leader, would you want to try to persuade a nation -- or pseudo-nation -- of unemployed poorly educated teenage boys raised in a UN-supervised European-funded death cult to see sense? Any analysis of the "Palestinian problem" that doesn't take into account the most important determinant on the ground is a waste of time.



But doan worry none--why the Canadians is nuthin' if not efficient when it comes to squelching free speech-- see, they's now conductin' a "human rights" trial--no no, not in defense of Mark Steyn's free speech, but in defense of the Islamic whiners who pretend to be offended by the fact that somebody wrote how much ground they's gained.

Canada has a sneaky grenade in its law--article 13 of the human rights law says nobody can say or write thangs wif' the "potential" of causin' hatred toward another group.

SO-- ya'll is thinkin' that when the mullahs say to kill Americans that the Canadians hit them wif' Article 13? Whas' wrong wif ya'? That would be logical.

Nope the article 13 Human Rights moneky trial is against the Canadian who only said the obvious. Now the court wants to determine the "potential" of the harm of what he wrote. (I likned it above--read it an' see if ya think that article is worth a Human Rights trial!!)

Who can measure social potential? Ain't no dang way fer no judge to make a decision on "potential". When law is applied on supposition not actual happenings we's all in deep donkey dung. Even so, some Canadian lawmakers are EMBARRASSED about the idiocy of this "human rights" court that has run amok.

Anyhoo...ya' can read all about it --how the nation of Canada is a self-hating self-conscious appeaser nation on the skids. (wif' sincere apologies and sympathy to the three REAL Canadians left)

5.20.2008

"Let the Kafirs go to hell" (that's you, folks)

Good-Bye Mosque, Hello Oriana


The folks in Verona figgered out the score. They razed a mosque, renamed the square for Oriana Fallaci.

5.12.2008

RULE the World



On January 5, 2005, Ahmadinejad said, "We must believe in the fact that Islam is not confined to geographical borders, ethnic groups and nations. It's a universal ideology that leads the world to justice. We don't shy away from declaring that Islam is ready to rule the world. We must prepare ourselves to rule the world."


Iran, a nation that feverishly works toward nuclear capability, has plans for you. Warms ya' heart doan it?





Concurrent wif' the recent NATO and G-7 meetin's, I'se read a heap of ink that say the USA dominance is over, decline is inevitable an' good riddance. Some even swoon to learn about China's semi-secret submarine base (Well, NOT India of course).

Okay, world. Let's see how ya' likes the other guys.

Ya''ll knows they ain't never been a time when power din't seek to rule. The only real question we need to answer is whose rule and what kind of rule can we live wif'?

4.04.2008

Chaucer on Islam

2259965546_6fc7384f4b_m_2 Heere Bigynneth the Tale of the Asse-Hatte.

An Archbishop of Canterbury Tale

With apologies to Geoffrey Chaucer

1 Whan in Februar, withe hise global warmynge

2 Midst unseasonabyl rain and stormynge

3 Gaia in hyr heat encourages

4 Englande folke to goon pilgrimages.

5 Frome everiches farme and shire

6 Frome London Towne and Lancanshire

7 The pilgryms toward Canterbury wended

8 Wyth fyve weke holiday leave extended

9 In hybryd Prius and Subaru

10 Off the Boughton Bypasse, east on M2.

11 Fouer and Twyntie theye came to seke

12 The Arche-Bishop, wyse and meke

13 Labouryte and hippye, Gaye and Greene

14 Anti-warre and libertyne

15 All sondry folke urbayne and progressyve

16 Vexed by Musselmans aggressyve.

17 Hie and thither to the Arche-Bishop's manse

18 The pilgryms ryde and fynde perchance

19 The hooly Bishop takynge tea

20 Whilste watching himselfe on BBC.

21 Heere was a hooly manne of peace

22 Withe bearyd of snow and wyld brows of fleece

23 Whilhom stoode athwart the Bush crusades

24 Withe peace march papier-mache paraydes.

25 Sayeth the pilgryms to Bishop Rowan,

26 "Father, we do not like howe thynges are goin'.

27 You know we are as Lefte as thee,

28 But of layte have beyn chaunced to see

29 From Edinburgh to London-towne

30 The Musslemans in burnoose gowne

31 Who beat theyr ownselfs with theyr knyves

32 Than goon home and beat theyr wyves

33 And slaye theyr daughtyrs in honour killlynge

34 Howe do we stoppe the bloode fromme spillynge?"


35 The Bishop sipped upon hys tea

36 And sayed, "an open mind must we

37 Keep, for know thee well the Mussel-man

38 Has hys own laws for hys own clan

39 So question not hys Muslim reason

40 And presaerve ye well social cohesion."

41 Sayth the libertine, "'tis well and goode

42 But sharia goes now where nae it should;

43 I liketh bigge buttes and I cannot lye,

44 You othere faelows can't denye,

45 But the council closed my wenching pub,

46 To please the Imams, aye thaere's the rub."

47 Sayeth the Bishop, strokynge his chin,

48 "To the Mosque-man, sexe is sinne

49 So as to staye in his goode-graces

50 Cover well thy wenches' faces

51 And abstain ye Chavs from ribaldry

52 Welcome him to our communitie."

53 "But Father Williams," sayed the Gaye-manne

54 "Though I am but a layman

55 The Mussleman youthes hath smyte me so

56 Whan on streets I saunter wyth my beau."

57 Sayed the Bishop in a curt replye

58 "I am as toolrant as anye oothere guy,

59 But if Mussleman law sayes no packynge fudge,

60 Really nowe, who are we to judge?"

61 Then bespake the Po-Mo artist,

62 "My last skulptyure was hailed as smartest

63 Bye sondry criticks at the Tate

64 Whom called it genius, brillyant, greate

65 A Jesus skulpted out of dunge

66 Earned four starres in the Guardian;

67 But now the same schtick withe Mo-ha-med

68 Has earned a bountye on my hed."

69 Sayed the Bishop, "that's quyte impressyve

70 To crafte a Jesus so transgressyve

71 But to do so with the Muslim Prophet

72 Doomed thy neck to lose whats off it.

* * *
Ya'll Aunty WISHES she had written such a fine tale--sign, alas, I done stole it outright!

Readeth the remainder here

3.26.2008

Aunty mounts a Crusade: Ain't goin' be no PURPLE America


I Interrupt the series of posts on the Crusades to bring you a contemporary Islamic post:

Barack Hussein Obama.

Iffin' youse squeamish, turn back NOW.

This is the only warnin' --what follows is realpolitik. Material ya' ll ain't gonna see in many places. The Media doesn't want ya'll to know, but I'se layin' it out here.

Youse gonna get a dose of Barack's true MARXIST identity, his collusion wif' Islam, his frauds.

He is jes' another false messiah....nuthin' in this heah post fer no sissy-fied folks.

So turn back if youse allergic to logic, truth and straight talkin'.


Ya'll whose left readin' this, youse welcome to opine on either side of the matter --jes' please keep the language decent enough fer my granny to read. Ya'll can have real strong sayin's, be sarcastic, ironic, strident, acerbic, even acid tongued...jes' no foul language, sugarplums.


Buckle up, here we go:

Obama said, "we need a leader who can finally move beyond the divisive politics of Washington and bring Democrats, independents and Republicans together to get things done."

He's still smokin' dope if he thinks we wanna "get done" any of the thangs he wants to "get done."

We'uns don't want socialized medicine, gay "marriages," and no kindergarten texts like King and King wif' a gay Prince Charming who snubs Cinderella so he sodomize the neighbor's princeling. The gay community has decided that if Clinton was the first "Black President" then Obama is to be the first " gay president:"

"If Bill Clinton was, as Toni Morrison once argued, our first Black president, could Barack Obama be our first gay? Is Obama the hope lesbians and gays have been waiting for — and if not, why should all Americans care?

No one, perhaps, but Obama. Obama is rewriting and reframing the cultural discourse on gay and lesbian rights… Obama is creating the cultural conditions within which political, legal, and social change can take place."

AND, we don't want infanticide when the baby is born, but if Barack don't like his looks, he wants the docs to smother it even hours after birth. Peter Singer is dancin' in the moonlight, haid thrown back in shrieking howl.

It's illogical. The MOST liberal senator of all wif' the MOST liberal voting record of all thinks he can build some "consensus" wif' Republicans?

Would you vote fer Ted Kennedy? Well, chickens, Obama's record is to the LEFT of Teddy-boy. Here's a clue fer ya': When Moveon.org thinks youse cute as a piglet, youse nuthin' but a warthog.

There is a REASON that the Red states is RED, folks. It is to stop polluting the culture wif' Blue state failures. Obama is a feckless legislator with nuthin' to his credit. He cain't even keep the Dems civil, when he goes to "reach out" to others to "get things done" they will slap him upside his tumid haid. Fool. They ain't no Republican wif RED blood who would sully theyself wif' anything he proposes.

But looky, here's what he said on that abysmal votin' record:

"I'm more likely to fall left of center than right of center. But as president, I would be setting the terms of debate." OH WOW! OH OBAMA WOULD YOU? SWOON, FAINT.

The man is simply insane to think that is how to "unite the country." Would you vote fer a fella who doan even know what the cause of "divisive" is, yet he thinks he can unite it anyway?

Obama say he ain't heered what his pastor been preachin' fer 20 years? Ya' know whas' wrong wif that? Not that it is a lie as big as Obama's haid, but that he's so arrogant he thinks we stoopid enough to believe it--yep, that's what his opinion of you is: an imbecilic voting unit.

Pay attention, sports fans. "Nation of Islam" leader, Louis
Farrakhan has said that jes' the "black, brown, red, and yellow" people of the country but not "white" folks would be saved by Obama-messiah. Then Farrakhan compared Obama Fard Mohammed, the founder of the Nation of Islam. Seems Fard Mohammed was born like Obama--to a white mama and a black daddy. Obama say he doan have no truck wif Farrakhan, but gimme a break--if his "pastor" of 20 years gives Farrakhan a major PUBLIC award, how can Obama say that? Gimme a royal pain in the fanny break.


Obama is a bigot. He chose a bigot as the "preacher" to marry him to that sniveling ingrate of a bigot, Michelle, and to baptize his kids into hatred.

He married a commie. Ain't kiddin' ya--she and he is both Saul Alinsky spawns. (But, so is Hillary--which is why she cain't beat him at the game--they follow the same rule book, but he is "new" and more energized) They DETEST America and liberty and capitalism. Alinsky taught them --all the young and restless and ambitious rebels--how to cajole the middle and lower middle class to be envious of those a rung higher on the ladder. How to convince them that they were "owed" by the government, "owed" by the achievers...yeah, Alinsky taught folks how to be miserable so he could "fix" their miserable lives by enslaving them to gubmint welfare: Give me power over yore freedoms and I'll give you a thin gruel and a crust of bread... for free.

Alinsky was a Chicago tough--a Marxist who taught gangs to organize and agitate the public, extort from small bidness, blackmail big bidness, how to threaten civil servants and bully their neighbors until the city caved into their threats and created special voting blocks for gangs. He taught them that this thievery was demanding an getting what the rebels "deserved." Alinsky taught his devotees to bring about the marxist revolution via social and political pressure, rather than tanks--Stalin's mistake was he was jes' so obvious, ya' see?) Alinsky is the infamous author of Rules for Radicals.

Obama's been drinkin' Alinsky kool-aid since he was 23, when went to work at Calumet Community Religious Conference, run by white marxists. (Who shamelessly use hot-headed, arrogant and ambitious "house niggers" ( not Aunty's term!--it's used by operatives to indicate a duped mulatto who is useful to the "Master" that is controlling a black voting block.) )

TO see the confluence in Obama's development in both politics and religion, note that his church, and pastor Wright, espouse a faith in Black Liberation Theology. Liberation Theology is Marxist, and so is the atheist, Saul Alinsky. Lib theo is the faith of the Sandinistas, those murderous thugs who used religion to persuade ignorant peon farmers to slaughter their poor, peon neighbors in the name of "liberation." Why, because the slaughtered refused to join the Sandinista's war. They decided to keep on farming the land that belonged to wealthy Nicaraguans (and Germans). For this "failure to actualize" they were butchered in their hammocks.

Obama's "church" is nothing but a Marxist front for so-called "liberation theology." It is not about God or Christianity, as numerous other Black pastors have said.

According to the New Republic, on Obama having mastered the Alinsky tactics:

"He was a natural, the undisputed master of agitation, who could engage a room full of recruiting targets in a rapid-fire Socratic dialogue, nudging them to admit that they were not living up to their own standards. As with the panhandler, he could be aggressive and confrontational. With probing, sometimes personal questions, he would pinpoint the source of pain in their lives, tearing down their egos just enough before dangling a carrot of hope that they could make things better."

  • Obama, from his own book:
To avoid being mistaken for a sellout,I chose my friends carefully.The more politically active black students.The foreign students.The Chicanos.The Marxist Professors and the structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets.At night,in the dorms,we discussed neocolonialism,Franz Fanon,Eurocentrism,and patriarchy.When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our stereos so loud that the walls began to shake,we were resisting bourgeois society's stifling constraints.We weren't indifferent or careless or insecure.We were alienated.



The fiery Harlem preacher Rev. Manning is incensed that Obama 's campaign includes "54 DD white women" but Obama's own advisers noted in a February 2007 Rolling Stone article that :

"...running preliminary polls, his advisers noticed something remarkable: Women responded more intensely and warmly to Obama than did men. In a seven-candidate field, you don't need to win every vote. His advisers, assuming they would pick up a healthy chunk of black votes, honed in on a different target: Every focus group they ran was composed exclusively of women, nearly all of them white. There is an amazingly candid moment in Obama's autobiography when he writes of his childhood discomfort at the way his mother would sexualize African-American men. "More than once," he recalls, "my mother would point out: 'Harry Belafonte is the best-looking man on the planet.' " What the focus groups his advisers conducted revealed was that Obama's political career now depends, in some measure, upon a tamer version of this same feeling, on the complicated dynamics of how white women respond to a charismatic black man. "

Obama is a plagerist--that is, a liar and a thief, a fake, a fraud--a man willing to lie and cheat his way along in this world. He was ON THE STAGE BESIDE Deval Patrick when the latter gave is famous "just words" speech...yeah, the same speech that Obama lifted a few months later. He knew what he was doing.

Obama has deep Muslim sympathies--if not more. He supported (2006) the Muslim thug Raila Odinga
in Kenya--traveled to Kenya to campaign on his behalf. When Odinga lost, he and his militia went on a killing spree. According to Odinga and Obama, the two men share the same tribal heritage. The Kenyan gubmint denounced Obama for his meddlin'.

Meanwhile, Obama's African grandmother is a Muslim, always has been. When Odinga lost the election, his tribal followers burned opposition families alive in the churches --where they fled after their villages were pillaged. Christian villages, of course. Odinga made an alliance with Kenyan Muslin Councils --if he was elected, he would enact Sharia Law.

Obama's advisor meets with Syria's (anti-American)Islamic president in February.
That ole sly Marxist, Zbigniew Brzezinski,
was in Syria gettin' all cozy with al-Assad, Syria's anti-US, pro Iran president.
What does it have to do wif' Obama? Why jes' this: Zbig is set to become Secretary of State in an Obama administration.



Wanna' know how the Islamic world feels about Obama? Here's a little clip from the Brookings Institute Fellow, Tamara Coffman Wittes, who reported from Qatar that Barack Hussein Obama's run for the US presidency was a source of joy in the Gulf states.

"A friend from the Gulf tells me her young relative was so excited about the Democratic candidate that he tried to donate money over the Internet, as he'd heard so many young Americans were doing. Then he found out he had to be a U.S. citizen to do so. Another young woman, visiting from next-door Saudi Arabia, said that all her friends in Riyadh are “for Obama.” The symbolism of a major American presidential candidate with the middle name of Hussein, who went to elementary school in Indonesia, certainly speaks to Muslims abroad."

The Obama "foreign affairs" staff also includes Robert Malley, son of a Syrian whose anti-Western writings reveal an deep antipathy for the US. Who is MAlley? Funny tht you ask, pets. Lemme see...well, he was appointed to Bill Clinton's administration in Middle East Affairs. Today he is on the board of George Soros' think tank (read: fake lobby for Islam) International Crisis Group. Soros, of course, is the evil wizard behind every Marxist media event, media conglomerate. Did I say Soros is " evil" ? Ha. Will some one PLEASE coin a more evocative word for this dessicated human-hating threat to freedom?


But back to Robert Malley--his American mama and Egyptian born, but Syrian daddy were Communist agitators who were expelled from France:

Egyptian-born Simon Malley, 47, his American wife Barbara and their three children reportedly have gone into hiding. They face expulsion for what officials describe as "political activities which do not correspond with, and even run contrary to, French interests in certain countries."
(Washington Post, Aug. 7, 1980)


...Daddy Simon Malley was the founder the Egyptian Communist Party and he was ejected by various European governments :

Interior Minister Christian Bonnet told the (French) Assembly that some articles written by Malley were “genuine appeals to murder foreign chiefs of state... ”(United Press International October 3, 1980)

Ya'll hangin' in here wif' me? See, Robert Malley's daddy were a Syrian Communist--he hated the West on two accounts--that he hates freedom and capitalism since he is a commie, AND, as a Muslin born (but apostate) Syrian, he hated the "Eurocentric" world--he said France was "racist" for expelling him--sound familiar? Malley believed in revolution and worked for it. In 1980 Associated Press reported that Malley supported the societ invasion of Afghanistan , Cuba's invasion of Angola and praised the kidnapping of US hostages in Iran; Reckon what that snake he learnt his boy, Robert, who is now in Obama's camp stirrin' up Islamic connections in Syria as I write this post??



Next, guess who sweet talked the French government into letting the Malley family back into France? Why, none other than Yasir Arafat. Heh. Seein' a pattern here? Yep, Arafat and the Malley parents were big buddies. Is ya surprised then to learn that Robert Malley wrote a defense of Arafat for the Clinton administration? Reckon "conflict of interest" had any meaning in Clinton's regime? Malley's family owed their French lives to Arafat, but their son is gonna be "fair" when representing American Mid-East policy???

[ note: this is not a defense of, or endorsement of Israel or Ehud Barrack. It is confined to a look at Malley's fitness to serve an America that is threatened by Islam]


Make no mistake li'l chickens, Obama and his henchmen are already negotiating wif' Islamic terrorists.

What's goin' on? Well, I ain't sayin' that Obama is a believer in the Qur'an, or in Islamic faith any more than he is a true Christian. Obama is a pretender of every sort.


What he DOES admire is Islamic jihad as a strategy to achieve a political goal. This is a man who leaks hubris from every orifice. He thinks his messianic charm will tame the jihadists, that he can negotiate wif' em based on his own Muslim inheritance.

He is a true believer in Saul Alinky, the Marxist. Alinsky's chief method was to agitate and organize in the churches of the poor who are easily duped with promises of easy wealth, and in the gangs of revolutionaries addicted to violence. Obama does the same--he is MARXIST to the core. If Islam will aid his rise to power--great. His own "pastor" Jeremiah Wright is a "Black liberation theologist" which is code speak for Marxism under religious guise. (See above) And Arafat was also an Egyptian Marxist who made his fortune off poor Palestinians. That's right, sweet pets, Arafat was no believer in Islam, only a pretender so he could defraud the Palestinians. Arafat and the Malleys were Marxists.

Ya'll gettin' it? Obama ain't shy about what "change" he has in mind.


Obama is co-author of a bill known as the"Global Poverty Act" which puts every American under the jackboot of the United Nations, makes us indentured servats to the globalists. In the name of "poverty" we will be impoverished so that these globocrats can engineer the world to their

The United Nations intends to find any and all methods to create a global taxation policy in order to have trillions of dollars each year in its budget--to dwarf any nation's economy, in other words. They propose a global tax on the internet, on every financial transaction that crosses national borders, and an environmental tax and a "global poverty tax"...all of it is intended to put YOU in chains. With the money the UN levies on us'uns, they plan to control every blink you make. They plan to use their trillions to build a "global peace force" ( yep, a global military force), install cameras( infrared too) and audio scanners in every town hall. I don't need to paint this picture fer ya', it's been done plenty.

Obama is theirs, used by, controlled by, wound up and sent marching by them globocrats.

America, hold on to your RED State freedoms: doan let no Obama try to turn us all purple-they ain't no way to mix Blue State Socialism wif' Red State freedom.

2.10.2008

Essay II On Islam


Aunty is silent until Easter in observance of Lent.

Ya'll please feel free to explore and comment on these essays (see posts below) concerning the nature of Islam. An' I'se gonna catch-up wif' any comments after Easter when the next post will be on the Crusades.

1.27.2008

Is Islam Evil? Essay II



Essay II


Islam and the West: A Brief History


“In this final phase, the world of the infidels was divided between two superpowers, the Soviet Union and the United Sates. We have now dealt successfully with the more deadly, the more dangerous of the two infidel powers. Dealing with the soft, pampered, and degenerate Americans will be easy.”

---Osama bin Laden


What does bin Laden mean by “this final phase”? He refers to history, the final phase of history before Islam rules the globe on behalf of Allah. He uses “we” to address not only his immediate followers but the entirety of the Islamic world. Further, he assumes they have an appreciation for Islamic history since Muslim raiders first erupted from the Arabian Peninsula to declare jihad on the rest of humanity. By 750 A.D. Islam ravaged much of the known world. Bin Laden’s followers know their history, its victories, its recent defeats and its desire for a final victory. They know their history.

Do you?


Contents

1. Palestine 70 A.D.
2. Rome Falls, Christian Europe is Born
3. Palestine and the Coming of Islam
4. Jihad and Sexual Tension


Note to new readers:

Comments have been made that this blog is "bigoted" because it observed that Islam is intrinsically evil--that is, that Islam teaches evil in the Qur'an and the Hadiths (See glossary) .

To make such a statement is not bigoted if it can be shown from Islam's own teachings--political and religious-- that its premises give rise to evil.

An important distinction: I have not said that Muslims are all evil. That is quite false. What is asserted here is that Islamic teaching is gravely flawed and is a breeding ground for all manner of evil. In some quarters there are Islamic teachers of moderation. But these are "modern" and according to some Islamic leaders such moderation is opposed to Mohamed's teaching.

These essays demonstrate that Islam is first a political and military system, and as such dominates its origin as a religion.

Please find resources including glossary, Qur'an , bibliography and maps Down in the Hollow (see also link at right) To better understand this second essay, please see Essay I on Islam


Palestine 70 A.D.

The water was gone. Vespasian’ engineers diverted the wells and inside the Temple Mount every throat was seared from thirst. Roman soldiers swarmed through breeches in the walls. The few who had escaped to the Temple during the siege of Jerusalem now faced a brutal slaughter.

Some years earlier violence erupted in Caesarea, Nero looking on from Rome, when Greeks invaded the seaside city. By 66 A.D faithful Jews managed to seize the traitor Herod’s fortress, Massada, overwhelming the Roman garrison. The Jewish band inspired other “rebels” to move on Jerusalem, to the Temple; there they forced the heretical priests to cease their blasphemous sacrifices to Emperor Nero. Rome answered their rebellion.


Now the horrors recounted in Josephus’ history, Jewish Wars, gripped the emaciated Jewish survivors of the three-year Roman siege as they huddled within the walls of the Temple. So few Jews were left in Jerusalem that cats outnumbered people.

A generation earlier, in 33 A.D., after Christ was crucified, resurrected and ascended to heaven, His followers were instructed to “Go ye into all the world….” The first Christians –mostly Jews—no longer considered the Temple in Jerusalem to be the center of their faith or identity, though it was revered. Their faith included Jewish history, the prophets and the books of the Old Testament, but was newly centered in God made Man in the Person of Jesus. Jesus, now understood as God, the Second Person of the Trinity, promised to be with them bodily, though supernaturally, in the Mass. Hence, worship did not depend on a location or a building.

Palestine—literally land of the Philistines, a Greek people who settled in Canaan about 12th cent, B.C.—was the Holy Land, but He who made it holy was with Christians wherever the Mass was celebrated.

These disciples established Christian communities all over the Hellenized world (Greek and Latin speaking cultures of the Mediterranean and the Middle East) as well as North Africa and parts of India. In Antioch, they were first called “Christians.” Some Christians remained in Jerusalem where Herod the Great persecuted them-- beheading the apostle James, first bishop of Jerusalem. Yet, the early Christian efforts at evangelization had moved far beyond the borders of hereditary Israel. Those who remained in Israel after the Christian expansion were Jews who lived in an uneasy division—those faithful to Jewish law, and those who, like Herod and the apostate priests of the Temple, maintained their power via collusion with detested Rome.

Now Jerusalem was on fire. Battering rams hurled boulders against the temple walls…when the city was finally subdued, the temple lay utterly destroyed.



The few survivors were taken slaves and Jews were forbidden to reenter the city. Jewish faith, deprived of its Temple, was forced to abandon its daily sacrifices as commanded in the Old Testament; the Jewish priesthood was obliterated along with the Temple and all that remained was the rabbinic authority.





The “Diaspora” or dispersed Jews formed communities in Rome, Carthage, and Iberia (Spain). Many traveled to what is today Eastern Europe and Russia. Some joined the ancient Jewish settlements in the Arabian Peninsula(See Essay I).

Jerusalem was then colonized by those Rome permitted to scavenge among the ruins of the once magnificent city. Pagan practices flourished. Sporadic rebellions by small Jewish armies flare up against the Romans until 135 A.D. However, the Romans resettle “Syria- Palestine” with Gentiles. Small Jewish settlements remain on the borders of Palestine.

Islam lay 500 years in the future.

Rome Falls, Christian Europe Is Born

Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity in 312. His predecessors, particularly Diocletian, persecuted Christians, burning their homes, churches and books. Christians were imprisoned and enslaved and even children were beheaded.

After his conversion, the Emperor issued the Edict of Milan, which made Christian worship lawful. Under Constantine a renewed interest in the Holy Land spurred rebuilding in the historic cities of Palestine. Under his patronage and that of his mother, Helena, hundreds of Catholic Churches were built—most notably the Church of the Nativity and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Thousands of Christians moved to Palestine (Israel) to be in the land where their Savior lived. More came on pilgrimage. At this time the Jewish population was a small minority. (picture?)

The Emperor also built an imperial city in Byzantium (Turkey), the famed Constantinople, modern day Istanbul. Byzantium is the Eastern Roman Empire—the Greek speaking half of the Empire. Greek culture predominated. Historians often date the birth of “Christendom” from the conversion of Constantine and the Edict of Milan. When the legal structure of the empire favored Christianity, it permitted Christians to assume office, seek education, build cities and establish a Christian culture. (Pagans however were not persecuted, nor prevented from continuing their “outmoded practices” in the emperor’s words.)

Meanwhile, in the heart of Persia (Modern day Iraq and Iran), Christians were tolerated. The Chaldean Church (Iraq) is one of the oldest in Christian history. After Constantine converted, some Persian rulers persecuted Christians because they were now allies of the detested Roman Emperor.

The key point to consider is that Christianity was well established both geographically as well as culturally throughout Roman Empire by 350A.D. including Palestine and much of the Middle East, and even as far as India and the British Isles. (The apostle Thomas established a Catholic community in India by 70 A.D., Bartholomew in Arabia, St. James to Spain.) Christians assimilated both Greek learning and the Roman Rule of Law. Missionaries were sent to Britain, France and beyond. Both England and France had a strong Christian culture by 400 A.D. In a few short centuries the peaceful spread of Christianity covered large areas of three continents. Christians needed no swords, no pillage, and no promises of eternal orgies in exchange for the massacre of unbelievers.

In contrast, three hundred years later, as Islamic jihad gouged out a new map of the Middle East, the method of "evangelization" was by the sword. While both Christianity and Islam would make claims for their faith as the final revelation from God, the method of spreading their respective messages stand in stark contradiction.

When Julian the Pagan became emperor (361-63) Christians again fled persecution, reminiscent of the early persecutions. Drawings and inscriptions on the walls of Roman catacombs detail the plight of the persecuted. (picture). Julian also turned his hatred on the Persians, fomenting a simmering war that continued for 200 years, depleting and weakening the entire region of east of Palestine.

(at left: Christ as Good Shepherd on wall of the Catacombs in Rome)


St. Augustine (4th cent.) thought that Providence had ordered history so that Christianity would take root very quickly throughout the known world. That famous Pax Romana --the general lawfulness and order and the efficient Roman governance, provisions (roads), insured that missionary travels could be readily achieved—to carry out the Savior’s command to “go ye into all the world”. Most citizens spoke Latin and Greek—a common language also makes evangelization easier.

The wealth and education of the Empire meant populated cities—in short, within a 150 years the Christian gospel had reached the outer bands of the Roman Empire, which ruled 60 million inhabitants.

The Roman Empire to the West fell in 475 to the barbarian hordes. The Huns, expelled a half-century earlier from China, gradually made heir way westward. They, drove out Goths, Franks, Vandals, Sueves, Lombards, Saxons—all of these found a bloated soft “empire” whose borders were ill governed, ill protected. (hmmm? Sound familiar?)

All of the area we call the “West” was suddenly comprised of new nations: Lombards in Italy, a Goths and Visigoths migrated to Spain, the Frankish kingdom in Gaul, and the Angles and Saxons in the British Isles. The Dark Ages began—essentially a brutish chaos, fighting between the barbarians and the citizens of the former Roman Empire. Much of the learning and culture of the Roman era were lost to the average citizen.

The lightening spread of Christendom had followed the implosion of an empire under a series of debauched and lazy emperors. Christians suffered persecution and tortuous deaths. This suffering witness needed no armies to “convert” others. It is reasonable to assume that at this hinge moment—wit the empire crumbling around them—people were open to hearing the Christian message.

When barbarians confronted the early Popes, they met a message, not an army. Attila the Hun turned back from Rome when the elderly Pope Leo met him at the outskirts of the city, asking Attila as “conqueror of peoples” to conquer his own wrath and in mercy to turn back his raiders for the city of Rome was unable to defend itself. (Edward Gibbon, Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, chapter 35).

Christians set about preserving the wealth of Greek, Jewish and Roman learning –great monasteries with scriptoriums salvaged enormously important human achievements in the arts, agriculture, history, math and science as well as languages and of course, the scriptures. And they evangelized the invading tribes, most of them converted. Missionaries were sent throughout Europe and into Russia. (St. Patrick converted Ireland around the year 432, St. Columba evangelized Northern Scotland 590s.) These were the forebears –in genetics and in faith of most of the European population today.

Though the Roman Empire fell, Christianity grew. Christian principles taught that every person has an equal and inherent dignity before God, the Father of all. One’s eternal worth did not depend on one’s financial or social worth. [Cato saw the slave is chattel, an economic instrument with no right to human dignity. In contrast, St. Paul sends the runaway slave Onesimus back to his master to be “received not now as a slave, but instead of a slave, a most dear brother, especially to me. But how much more to thee, both in the flesh and in the Lord”] One may be the squire, the other a groomsman, but both were brothers in Christ. Each has an obligation to the other as Christians first, as squire and groom second. This creed is the foundation of European law, a Europe that is the birthplace of “human rights’ ”law. Christianity saved Western Europe from both pagan barbarism and Eastern nihilism, in the form of esoteric and Gnostic—essentially anti-humanistic—values.

Most of what we value in our civilization — hospitals, museums, universities, and the idea of human rights — is by origin Christian. These civilizing institutions and ideals did not arrive with the Vikings or Germanic tribes, or from the Eastern Gnostics.

Despite intra familial fighting, Europe was forged as a people with the same worldview. That worldview was fused to the Greek and Roman traditions and learning that the monks preserved during the darkest reign of barbarians or despots. It is said that the Christian faith created Europe and Europe created the Modern World.

Palestine and the Coming of Islam

Meanwhile, back at the oasis— The Persians (Sassanid dynasty) continued their advances against the Byzantines (eastern Empire) They took Damascus and Jerusalem, yanked the True Cross from the Church in Jerusalem and off loaded it in Ctesiphon, a massive city on the banks of the Tigris River in what is now Iraq. It was the ultimate insult.

Naturally, Emperor Heraclius takes a posse-- bearing the Mandylion (Later known as the Shroud of Turin) as their banner-- to retrieve the hunk of the True Cross (629 A.D.)

But this two hundred year seesaw war exhausts both the Byzantine and the Persian empires—providing a crucial opportunity for the Arab Muslims who have the urge to flex their new powers against something beyond the Arabia Peninsula. (Besides, there was great enmity between the Persians and the Arabs).

The Persians—thus depleted and lying around panting—had nothing left to fight off the Desert Terror—that is, the Muslin warriors took Ctesiphon in 637, when Umar was Caliph.

Over on the Mediterranean, in Palestine, Egypt, Turkey, Christians had their own internal wars—a lot of energy spent on disputes over heresies. (Palestine harbored partisans of the Monophysite heresy.) This made them ripe for a takeover by the Persians with the aid of the Jews who hoped the Persians would restore what the Romans took from them –Damascus fell in 613, Palestine in 614. Byzantines recovered the Holy Land for the Christians by 630. Soon thereafter Mohamed orders invasion of Palestine …a skirmish only since the he is dying.

By 632 --the year of Mohamed's death, the Muslims rule the Arabian peninsula. Next Syria, Palestine, Iraq, Egypt, and Persia --all belonging to the Persians or the Byzantines--succumb to jihad. After mourning, the Muslims renew their assault on the Holy Land and 634 Gaza goes Muslim and Christians flee ahead of the scimitars.

By 638, Jerusalem was controlled by Muslims. For 1300 years the Jews and Christians of Palestine have lived in dhimmitude.

[Mohammed once insisted that his followers must face Jerusalem when praying—thought to be a ploy to gain the support of the Jews of Mecca and Medina. The Koran does not mention Jerusalem. Yet it is supposed to be the site from which the prophet “ascended to Heaven” on his famous a night journey dream. Later caliphs decided this event took place in Jerusalem. They built the Dome of the Rock had been built in 687, and today the Al-Aqsa Mosque stands on the same site.]

After the Muslims conquered Syria (north of Palestine) they marched straight for Constantinople –first raid is in 675 or so…but it was repulsed. Not easily put off, the Muslims swarm over the island nations of Cyprus, Rhodes and Crete. Here brutality went unchecked—as though some demonic rage fueled its energy. With vast plunder to enrich its war coffers, Islamic warriors invaded, with no provocation, the first European “nation” —Cyprus, a Byzantine protectorate. The majority population was Greek. Two Muslim armies converged, 1700 warships strong (649). Those who escaped massacre were invited to pay vast sums in tribute to the governor of Muslim Syria.

The battles for Crete and Rhodes followed the first jihad raid on Cyprus. At Rhodes the famous Colossus of Rhodes (built in 290 BC) —one of the seven wonders of the ancient world—was disassembled and shipped back to Syria in 73 boats—there the Saracens (Muslims) sold it for scrap metal. Next jihad turned on Sicily and Sardinia, “sacking cities, carrying off booty and beautiful maidens.” (688 A.D.)

Islamic armies in the Mediterranean were led by an enormous personality, Muawiya, son of Abu Sufyan, who had once tried to kill Mohamed in battle. Abu was a businessman first, when Mohammed conquered Mecca, Abu converted. His son went on to become one of history’s greatest warriors.

Jihad and Sexual Tension

After the jihad on the islands of the Mediterranean, Islam swarmed over North Africa decimating Christian towns, burning and looting from churches and homes--then over the straights of Gibraltar into Spain (711) where they begin an eight-hundred year reign of wars, rape, slavery, pillage, and every manner of domination. Conquered populations were offered three “peaceful” choices: Convert to Islam, the sword, or pay yearly tributes and live as second-class citizens. Plunder and slaughter always preceded the persuasive offer.

How shall we assess the unparalleled military victories of the Muslims? In a scant hundred years after Mohamed’s death vast stretches of the former Byzantine and Roman Empires had fallen to the Saracen sword. Military scholars remain amazed at the ferocity of the Muslim warriors—an intensity never reached and sustained by other armies.

Two primary answers:

  1. Muslim warriors were taught that it was their religious duty to kill infidels—and by such duty save their own souls from damnation—either kill or suffer hell. As an added incentive the warrior who fell in battle against infidels received his multiple “houris” (maidens of pleasure) and orgasms that lasted “years”. Thus stimulated before battle, Muslim jihadists devoutly sought this eternity of sexual pleasure, not unlike the kamikaze pilots of WWII. This sexualized eternity stood in sharp contrast to the spiritual beneficence that Christianity promised. For the man who survived in battle the rewards were only slightly less appealing: plunder and spoils to fill his camel bags and the sex-slaves made of conquered women.

From the Hadiths of AL-Tirmidhi (892): “A houri is the most beautiful young woman, transparent in body. Her marrow is visible like the interior lines of pearls and rubies. She is as red wine in a white glass. Her body is of white color, and she is free from the physical weaknesses of an ordinary woman such as menstruation, menopause, urinal and offal discharge, and bodily pollution, she does not bear a child. A houri is a young girl showing large round breasts, firm and that do not dangle. Houris dwell in splendid palaces.”

Note that the Qur’an itself does not promise the number of houris a martyr enjoys…that number is found in the hadiths. It is in the Islamic Traditions that we find the 72 virgins in heaven specified: Al-Tirmidhi in the Book of Sunan (volume IV).

As detailed Al-Suyuti (died 1505), an Our’anic scholar: "Each time we sleep with a houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [i.e. Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetizing vaginas.”

Where on earth, literally, could a common man find such pleasures? A poor desert warrior is beguiled with promises that he is to become like Mohamed, a pitiless slayer of infidels, who surely took his fill of pleasure and yet was “holy”

At the risk of titillating readers of this blog, no more examples need be given –but imagine for a moment hordes of confined men at some forsaken desert garrison with too few earthly houris to go around…. how easily the man becomes a willing and ferocious martyr to his urgent imaginings of eternal sexual bliss—a type of bliss not found by any man on earth. Imagine too, death by scimitar from behind should you fail to fight the infidel in front of you.

  1. The second critical factor to the astonishing success of Islamic jihad in the early years of Islam is that their targets were weakened by years of war and lacked cohesive leadership. Worse, perhaps, was the religious disunity due to the rise in of heretical sects.

Part II

The Crusades: Liberation of Christians in the Holy Land

…. Coming next…

1.21.2008

Euro Leader: " Islam is Totalitarian", "Barbarian"




Europeans, weary of the civil strife that un-assimilated Muslims immigrants provoke, have slowly begun to speak up about the factual history of Islam. The politically correct gloss on cultural clashes has not brought the stability that Eurocrats had hoped their faked rhetoric would build.



In Austria politician Susanne Winter said that Islam is "a totalitarian system of domination that should be thrown back to its birthplace..." and noted that the prophet Mohamed was "a child molester"--reference to his "marriage" to six year old Alisha, a union that was consummated when the child was nine years old.

The increase in the incidence of barbarian practices--notably female genital mutilation--alarms Europe. This horrifying practice is emblematic of the Islamic attitude toward women.

Increasingly the average European's daily life requires engagement with tense Islamic elements.

A new chapter in the history of the West and Islam is being written. The ancient strife has never been resolved, merely gone dormant. The West will once again learn what their forebears won when Islam was repelled at the gates of Vienna and when Queen Isabel of Spain thrust the last of the Moors from Granada.



1.11.2008

Terror from the Heart of Islam : One Turkish Man's View




Of interest to our discussion is
this December 2007 report by Turkish National, Zafer Senocak, 46, who has lived in Berlin since the 1970s. The article (in German) appeared in a popular German paper.

[ note: text in RED is Aunty Belle's own emphasis]


image


Terror Comes from the Heart of Islam

You will not find the true face of Islam at the German Conference on Islam. You find it in countries like Pakistan. This Islam turns against all who don't live by the rules of the Koran - against democrats, against atheists and above all, against women. And the world watches in paralysis.



Koran and violence: Do they belong together?

Even if most Muslims do not admit it, terror belongs to the core dogma of Islam, it comes directly from the Koran. It turns against all who do not live and act according to the rules of the Koran, that is democrats, western inspired thinkers and scientists, against agnostics and atheists. And above all, it is directed directly against women. Islam is a tool in the hands of male traditionalists who strive with all might to prevent women from attaining equal rights and to free themselves from the yoke of the centuries.

[The true Islam, like you find it in countries like Pakistan], has started a world war. But the world behaves as if it knows nothing about it. Modern people are aware some conflict exists far away in the "back yards of Turkey". Unfortunately, in our modern networked world there is no "far away backyards" any more. There is only our "front door", and that's the place where things happen. The totalitarian intent of the Taliban and the terror cells is probably worse than that of fascism, it is not the result of a civilizing process. It exists in an environment where even the memory of civilized progress has ceased to exist.

This should be the call of those Muslims who see more in their religion than a blueprint for barbarism: To oppose the ghouls in their own rank and file, determined and with the necessary harshness. But alas, when they do it, if ever, it is only half spirited. Islam has nothing to do with terror, maintains the Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Other politicians scramble over each other to compose the most convincing condolence messages after each act of terror. Outright grotesque is the situation in Saudi Arabia. The kingdom trembles before the terrorists who it itself has created.

Muslims all over the world find themselves on the test bench. They pay for the neglect of previous generations. The spiritual decline and the inability to communicate with the modern world has led to the deplorable present situation. The times call for a coordinated effort from all people of reason. Islamic terror has spread to the whole world. The opposition is only half hearted, slow, and reluctant to a concentrated effort. To reach results, the common sense of the common people would have to go against the blind hatred of the fanatics. The opposite happens, the hatred is more and more being adopted by the masses. Still worse, many illegitimate despots ally themselves with the hatred to secure their throne. To make the situation worse, Muslims engage more and more in theological rhetorics. The vital question, how their religion can be made to sustain the development of a modern civilization, is largely avoided.

The free world is paralyzed

This behavior of the Muslims has certainly psychological reasons. People feel inferior compared to the west, humiliated and betrayed. But the political consequences of this psychosis are terrible. It plays into the hands of those who fan the flames of terrorism in order to create chaos in the Muslim world. It plays into the hand of those who see an interest in terrorism, and it prevents the establishment of democratic systems and judicial processes. Poverty and corruption find optimal conditions to grow in the Islamic world, an evil circle. This evil circle must be broken with the help of the free world and with military power, because nothing else has any effect! Those who fight in Afghanistan cannot pretend that nothing is wrong in Pakistan. The murder of Benazir Bhutto was preprogrammed. The fall of the Gaza strip to the Hamas terrorists was also foreseeable.

But the free world watches paralyzed. There was a lot of scorn in Europe over the American policy in Iraq. When it comes to criticism, nobody can beat the Europeans. Own ideas and political concepts are however scarce. The European policies towards the Muslim terror lacks power and resolve. Some countries want to negotiate, with Hamas, with the Taliban. Nuclear reactors for Gaddafi, roll out the red carpet for the Saudi king! In the end, the petrodollar rules. The west does not understand how deeply it hurts itself and betrays its own values. The Islamic terrorists go from one victory to the next. Benazir Bhutto will not be the last victim of the failed appeasement policy towards radical Islam.

Translated and edited by Wiking

1.05.2008

Honor Killings in USA, Plus Soldiers Speak out

More from the Religion of Peace? Father murders teen daughters.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,319525,00.html

Area police continue to search for a man who they believe killed his two teenage daughters and left their bodies in a taxi at an Irving hotel.

Police sealed off a street and surrounded the man’s home in Lewisville for more than five hours Wednesday but found that Yaser Abdel Said, 50, a cabdriver, was not inside.

He is being sought in connection with the deaths of Amina Yaser Said, 18, and Sarah Yaser Said, 17.

Both victims died of multiple gunshot wounds, the Dallas County medical examiner’s office ruled Wednesday…


But will the West ever recognize the true threat? From LTC Joseph C. Myers, Army Advisor to the Air Command and Staff College:

"More importantly we have not studied Islamic Law and few have seen or heard of even the English translation of it that has been in print for years, none had at JSOU or had read a work titled Understanding Jihad, War and Peace in the Law of Islam or even The Quranic Concept of War...I can go on but let me be frank.

This failure of intellectual preparation is a leadership failure, and it is as the 9-11 Commission warned, a failure of vision.

We have spent much intellectual capitol revamping and analyzing our own doctrine as it relates to counterinsurgency...it's time we do our homework on the threat...We began on September 12, 2001 with "Islam is a religion of peace," which soothed ideological sentiments of many but has failed us strategically, short-stopped the objective, sytstemic evaluation of the threat doctrine..."Islam is a religion of peace" is fine for public policy statements, but is not and cannot be the point of departure for competent military or intelligence analysis...it is in fact a logical flaw under any professional research methodology...you have stated the conclusion before you have done the analysis."


12.12.2007

Second Essay on Islam



* * UPDATE:

Ya'll will see a cowardly comment below by an "ANON" in the combox. The commenter's idea is that America is tainted by slavery and cannot point fingers at jihadists fer all the killin' they done-- check the responses fer the fun of it.

But any whose interested mebbe will want to check out the book at the left--a scholarly look at how many millions of Europeans have been enslaved by Muslims.

From a Review of Professor Davis' book:



(European) Slave numbers declined through four causes: death, escape, redemption (i.e. by ransom), and conversion to Islam. Davis gets annual rates from these causes of 17 percent, 1 percent, 2-3 percent, and 4 percent, respectively. This implies a total number of slaves, from the early 1500s to the late 1700s, of one to one and a quarter million. This is an astonishing number, implying that well into the 17th century, the Mediterranean slave trade was out-producing the Atlantic one. Numbers fell off thereafter, while the transatlantic trade increased; but in its time, the enslavement of European Christians by Muslim North Africans was the main kind of enslavement going on in the world.

Christians were captured by two methods. First, there was the seizing of ships by straightforward piracy. The ship itself became a prize along with its crew and passengers. Second, there were raids on the coasts of European countries. Spain, France, and Italy were worst affected, but the pirates sometimes ventured further afield. In 1627 they kidnapped 400 men and women from Iceland.

The victims in either case would be taken back to one of the Barbary ports — the main ones were Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli — and sold in a slave market, by auction. They ended up either as the domestic slaves of private persons, or as slaves owned by the state, to be put to work rowing galleys, or constructing public works. The first of these two fates was usually preferable, as there was some chance of humanity from a private owner. Prof. Davis’s account of the lives of galley slaves is hard to read, and state slaves employed on public works were not much better off. There was no large-scale private-enterprise slavery as in the plantations of the Old South. The North African states had little commercial culture.

The effect on the European coastal populations was dramatic. Entire areas were depopulated. The author even sketches out an argument that the culture of baroque Italy was determined in part by a turning inward from the terrors of coastal life — from the “fear of the horizon” that afflicted all the regions subject to slave raiding. He tells us (he is professor of Italian Social History at Ohio State University, by the way) that to this day there is an idiom in Sicilian dialect to express the general idea of being caught by surprise: pigliato dai turchi — “taken by the Turks.” The distress of those left behind, deprived of a husband of father, is painful to read about.

* *
Ya'll Aunty's point here is to disabuse anybody of the idea that because the USA has slavery in her history, that she cain't complain about the jihadist horrors. Islam teaches and promotes an evil ideology against the entire world unless and until they submit to Islam. This monstrous teaching is the fertile field of the Islamic terror that Anon tries to excuse by pretending that Western abuses is no worse'n Islam-- utterly laughable.

The abuses of ISLAM is systemic and taught as a good thang--not an occasional aberration, and NEVER lamented, but still in existence.





Hey all ya'll whose regulars and to any visitors--Aunty invites ya'll to read the first essay and references, scroll backwards to see how we got into this yak-fest on Islam.
I meant to git up the essay on a Brief History of Islam and the West--an' I will...but not before Christmas (sorry!! I know, I promised...really sorry).

Meanwhile, I'se gonna post various clips from other folks...startin' with this one:

from http://www.humanevents.com/ )



A passenger revolt occurred on a Malaga-Manchester flight. Vacationing Brits refused to fly with two Arabic-speaking men. This came in the wake of arrests of 21 British-born Muslims who were plotting to blow up as many as 11 trans-Atlantic flights.

A spokesman for Britainâ™s opposition Tory party said the passengers panicked into “behaving irrationally.” Fancy that, not wanting to fly with members of a faith whose adherents keep trying to blow things up.

Within days of this incident, a Lebanese student was arrested for trying to plant bombs on German trains. In India, meanwhile, a group with alleged ties to al-Qaeda threatened to blow up the 17th century Taj Mahal.

If Muslims make travelers nervous, its not without cause.

Would you be more likely to have an anxiety attack at 20,000 feet if the passenger seated next to you was: A) An Irish nun saying the Rosary? B) A Mormon missionary in regulation white shirt and narrow, black tie? C) A Hari Krishna in a standard-issue saffron robe? or D) A bearded bloke of Middle Eastern complexion holding a well-thumbed Koran?


Guessing the religion of those who plant bombs, highjack planes, fire into crowds of civilians, take hostages and murder hostages is the world's ultimate no-brainer.

And yet our leaders, the media and many of us pretend there’s absolutely no connection between psychopathic, ideological killers and the religion which exalts the slaughter of unbelievers.

To counter confusion here, a la Letterman, I humbly offer The Top 10 Reasons Why It's Quite Possible That Islam Isn't Exactly A Religion of Peace....

Where Have All The Moderate Muslims Gone

If suicide bombers are radical Muslims, apologists for suicide bombers must be moderate Muslims. (In a letter to Tony Blair following the unraveling of the latest plot, 40 Muslim community leaders — including six members of Parliament — claimed Britain's foreign policy gave ammunition to extremists)

If someone slaughtered hundreds of innocents in the name of Christianity, everyone from the Pope and Billy Graham to your parish priest or local pastor would denounce the crime as an obscenity — without reference to the fall of Constantinople.

Hardly a day goes by that evil isn't perpetrated in the name of Islam somewhere in the world. When it comes to denouncing same, moderate Muslims are mostly AWOL.



................