Showing posts with label civil war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civil war. Show all posts

12.29.2008

Russia sees US states in Civil War


Heh...well, nobody is surprised to see Russia hopin' we's all gonna crack an' civil war is on the US horizon. Then Russia will git Alaska as a prize...Japan gits Hawaii...the efete elite of the Northeastern states will demand entry into the EU. The Chinese take California and Seattle too.
Russia, of course, "resumes" her rightful place in world dominance.

In case y'all's missed it, here is a WSJ article detailing the prophecy of a former KGB officer now making the Russian Oprah & The View rounds:



****

MOSCOW -- For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the U.S. will fall apart in 2010. For most of that time, he admits, few took his argument -- that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. -- very seriously. Now he's found an eager audience: Russian state media.

[Prof. Panarin]

Igor Panarin

In recent weeks, he's been interviewed as much as twice a day about his predictions. "It's a record," says Prof. Panarin. "But I think the attention is going to grow even stronger."

Prof. Panarin, 50 years old, is not a fringe figure. A former KGB analyst, he is dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry's academy for future diplomats. He is invited to Kremlin receptions, lectures students, publishes books, and appears in the media as an expert on U.S.-Russia relations.

But it's his bleak forecast for the U.S. that is music to the ears of the Kremlin, which in recent years has blamed Washington for everything from instability in the Middle East to the global financial crisis. Mr. Panarin's views also fit neatly with the Kremlin's narrative that Russia is returning to its rightful place on the world stage after the weakness of the 1990s, when many feared that the country would go economically and politically bankrupt and break into separate territories.

A polite and cheerful man with a buzz cut, Mr. Panarin insists he does not dislike Americans. But he warns that the outlook for them is dire.

"There's a 55-45% chance right now that disintegration will occur," he says. "One could rejoice in that process," he adds, poker-faced. "But if we're talking reasonably, it's not the best scenario -- for Russia." Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.

Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces -- with Alaska reverting to Russian control.

In addition to increasing coverage in state media, which are tightly controlled by the Kremlin, Mr. Panarin's ideas are now being widely discussed among local experts. He presented his theory at a recent roundtable discussion at the Foreign Ministry. The country's top international relations school has hosted him as a keynote speaker. During an appearance on the state TV channel Rossiya, the station cut between his comments and TV footage of lines at soup kitchens and crowds of homeless people in the U.S. The professor has also been featured on the Kremlin's English-language propaganda channel, Russia Today.

Mr. Panarin's apocalyptic vision "reflects a very pronounced degree of anti-Americanism in Russia today," says Vladimir Pozner, a prominent TV journalist in Russia. "It's much stronger than it was in the Soviet Union."

Mr. Pozner and other Russian commentators and experts on the U.S. dismiss Mr. Panarin's predictions. "Crazy ideas are not usually discussed by serious people," says Sergei Rogov, director of the government-run Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies, who thinks Mr. Panarin's theories don't hold water.

Mr. Panarin's résumé includes many years in the Soviet KGB, an experience shared by other top Russian officials. His office, in downtown Moscow, shows his national pride, with pennants on the wall bearing the emblem of the FSB, the KGB's successor agency. It is also full of statuettes of eagles; a double-headed eagle was the symbol of czarist Russia.

The professor says he began his career in the KGB in 1976. In post-Soviet Russia, he got a doctorate in political science, studied U.S. economics, and worked for FAPSI, then the Russian equivalent of the U.S. National Security Agency. He says he did strategy forecasts for then-President Boris Yeltsin, adding that the details are "classified."

In September 1998, he attended a conference in Linz, Austria, devoted to information warfare, the use of data to get an edge over a rival. It was there, in front of 400 fellow delegates, that he first presented his theory about the collapse of the U.S. in 2010.

"When I pushed the button on my computer and the map of the United States disintegrated, hundreds of people cried out in surprise," he remembers. He says most in the audience were skeptical. "They didn't believe me."

At the end of the presentation, he says many delegates asked him to autograph copies of the map showing a dismembered U.S.

He based the forecast on classified data supplied to him by FAPSI analysts, he says. He predicts that economic, financial and demographic trends will provoke a political and social crisis in the U.S. When the going gets tough, he says, wealthier states will withhold funds from the federal government and effectively secede from the union. Social unrest up to and including a civil war will follow. The U.S. will then split along ethnic lines, and foreign powers will move in.

California will form the nucleus of what he calls "The Californian Republic," and will be part of China or under Chinese influence. Texas will be the heart of "The Texas Republic," a cluster of states that will go to Mexico or fall under Mexican influence. Washington, D.C., and New York will be part of an "Atlantic America" that may join the European Union. Canada will grab a group of Northern states Prof. Panarin calls "The Central North American Republic." Hawaii, he suggests, will be a protectorate of Japan or China, and Alaska will be subsumed into Russia.

"It would be reasonable for Russia to lay claim to Alaska; it was part of the Russian Empire for a long time." A framed satellite image of the Bering Strait that separates Alaska from Russia like a thread hangs from his office wall. "It's not there for no reason," he says with a sly grin.

Interest in his forecast revived this fall when he published an article in Izvestia, one of Russia's biggest national dailies. In it, he reiterated his theory, called U.S. foreign debt "a pyramid scheme," and predicted China and Russia would usurp Washington's role as a global financial regulator.

Americans hope President-elect Barack Obama "can work miracles," he wrote. "But when spring comes, it will be clear that there are no miracles."

The article prompted a question about the White House's reaction to Prof. Panarin's forecast at a December news conference. "I'll have to decline to comment," spokeswoman Dana Perino said amid much laughter.

For Prof. Panarin, Ms. Perino's response was significant. "The way the answer was phrased was an indication that my views are being listened to very carefully," he says.

The professor says he's convinced that people are taking his theory more seriously. People like him have forecast similar cataclysms before, he says, and been right. He cites French political scientist Emmanuel Todd. Mr. Todd is famous for having rightly forecast the demise of the Soviet Union -- 15 years beforehand. "When he forecast the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1976, people laughed at him," says Prof. Panarin.


8.19.2008

Where are the Feminists? Horror in Afghanistan


I read The Kite Runner then A Thousand Splendid Suns. Avoid the latter if you have a weak stomach or are prone to nightmares.


The author, Khaled Hosseini is an Afghanistan physician who lives now in California. Both books detail the crushing oppression that Islam is to its people, but especially women. Here is the author discussing the idea for his novel, his early years in Kabul (Before the Soviet invasion)


Below are snips from recent news reports that underscore the reality of the horror of the lives of Afghanistani women.

Read these reports and ask yourself, "where are the feminists?" (Busy attacking stay-at- home moms!) Why have no oh-so-sophisticated feminists done something for true suffering and injustice?

Afghanistani children as young as three raped by roving Islamic thugs, UN reported

"Just last week, a 3-year-old girl was kidnapped and raped by unidentified men, a government official confirms. The toddler was later released and, the official says, is recovering.

"Rapists are roaming around with impunity," Shaima says, turning her attention to a man -- said to be the son of a powerful official -- who is accused of raping 22 girls in the northern province of Sar-I-Pul.

Sayed Nurallah says his 14-year-old daughter was one of the aforementioned victims. Nurallah says that coming forward with his daughter's story makes him a target, which he firmly accepts. He says that seeking justice for his daughter is a matter of integrity.

"She wakes up in the middle of the night screaming," Nurallah says of his daughter. "Her arms, legs, her body -- she is always tense and frightened."


Another report, also disturbing: Iranian woman forced into prostitution to support husbands drug addiction

--read it here.


6.28.2008

War or Not to War? When and Why










The Bad Catholic's Guide to Wine, Whiskey, and Song
:

The Just War tradition specified that Christians should only take part in a war if it is

• In a good cause, i.e., to repel aggression or protect the innocent. (No, "revenge," "a presidential sex scandal" or "an upcoming election" don't count.)

• Waged by legitimate authorities.

• Reasonably likely to succeed.

• Unlikely, proportionately, to cause more harm than good.

• The last resort after attempted negotiations.

• Waged with the minimum force necessary, making every attempt to protect civilians.


5.12.2008

RULE the World



On January 5, 2005, Ahmadinejad said, "We must believe in the fact that Islam is not confined to geographical borders, ethnic groups and nations. It's a universal ideology that leads the world to justice. We don't shy away from declaring that Islam is ready to rule the world. We must prepare ourselves to rule the world."


Iran, a nation that feverishly works toward nuclear capability, has plans for you. Warms ya' heart doan it?





Concurrent wif' the recent NATO and G-7 meetin's, I'se read a heap of ink that say the USA dominance is over, decline is inevitable an' good riddance. Some even swoon to learn about China's semi-secret submarine base (Well, NOT India of course).

Okay, world. Let's see how ya' likes the other guys.

Ya''ll knows they ain't never been a time when power din't seek to rule. The only real question we need to answer is whose rule and what kind of rule can we live wif'?

4.23.2008

Pacifism is for Twinkie eaters



“Freedom is not only a gift, but also a summons to personal responsibility. Americans know this from experience — almost every town in this country has its monuments honoring those who sacrificed their lives in defense of freedom, both at home and abroad.”

---Benedict XVI on White House Lawn



Hmmn...not exactly a pacifist statement.

9.12.2007

Belgium: Police Volently Beat Politicians

** Update appended at the end of this post**


Ya'll heered that Belgium is comin' unglued? A civil war.

They's a big story over at www.brusselsjournal.com ya' wanna see.


Yesterday the police publicly beat the tarnation outa...a druggie
with a Che t-shirt? Nope. A neo-nazi in brownshirt drag? Nope.

The police beat the stuffin' outa Luk Van Nieuwenhuysen,.....
the Vice-President of the Flemish Parliament.

Yep, the Flemish folks ain't interested in the marriage no more wif' the Walloons. Who can blame 'em?

Seems the problem is a difference of life philosophy. Not unlike a red state-blue state thang.

Why is it that the "tolerant" folks ain't tolerant of you havin' another idea about what is good in life? AN' the reason they won't let ya' go ain't on account of them lovin' ya--nope, as the Flemish note: "You are now there tax paying prisoner."

That example of the "tolerance" of the Belgian police yesterday occurred when a peaceful protest against the Islamization of Belgium, including elected representatives ended with police brutally beating the stuffin' outa folks whose crime was to disagree wif' the Islamic appeasement of the ruling administration. Others-- an Italian Member of Parliament (MEP) and a French MEP-- were arrested, too. One fella was arrested in the middle of an interview wif' the TV reporter--got that? The video shows he weren't violent, or disrespectful of police, he was the peaceful one--simply talking to a reporter when he was snatched and cuffed. This in the capital of the EU--heerin' this, sweet thangs? Heerin' it?

Even the Belgian Public TV reported that the police acted in "an extremely violent fashion."

So, ter make an analogy, can we have the police beat the dipity-doo outa Nancy and Hilary? (Ah, wouldn't it be lover-ly?)

In one video of the fracas, ya' can hear a policeman tell a reporter that Flemish press are not permitted. Now, that's tolerance fer ya'! Yep, free speech is alive an well in totalitarian Belgium.

More:
" A reporter, Goedele Devroy, told a colleague that she was amazed by the brutality of the police against the peaceful demonstrators 'who just stood there.' She added: 'This is strange because, when I rang the police this morning, they said that they would tolerate the demonstration if the demonstrators would not use violence' ."

It is not unremarked that the vice-mayor of Brussels is a Muslim.

The problem is--this is a vision of the future of the EU...notice I ain't sayin' it is a vision of EUROPE. But Iffin' EUROPEANS doan yank themselves outa the EU, they's toast. The situation in Belgium is jes' the prelude to the "EUSSR" as the free people have dubbed it.

Seriously, Europeans already had a sanguinary century--looks like another will follow. Soon.

When will people learn that it is Okay to live differently...it's just that ya' cain't do it in the same spot. If you wanna yang...go over there, so those who wanna ying can be left in peace.

If ya want a multicultural society, youse a fool. All that happens is that some who ain't buyin' yore multicultural idea WILL use yore laws to take you over--thas' the Islamicization we seein' now in the EU. Other cultures is for visitin' and tradin'... not livin' wif'.

Brief lesson on Multiculturalism: Ya cain't put a square peg in a round hole. The minute ya give up part of yore culture to accommodate another culture, yore culture is eroded.

An the polite rule is this: iffin' ya move ter another nation/culture to study, work, marry-abide by their laws and rules of decency.

Folks love ter visit other cultures. BUT, they wanna live in some sort of UNITY. It's natural.

I ain't so interested in multiculturalism that I gotta give up mah right to teach Western Civ. so another won't be offended. I wanna live whar' mah daughter can marry whomever she chooses, and can have her head uncovered. I wanna live whar' a prayer can be said afore a football game if folks wanna pray. I doan wanna be on guard all the time. So I would choose to live among those wif' similar ideas. Thas' how it is fer some Flemish folks too. And millions of other European folk.

Western Civilization has a right to be. And to defend itself.

Update: from the Brussels Journal website:

Vladimir Palko, MP (Slovakia) wrote a letter to Alain Cools, ambassador of Belgium in Slovakia and publicly protested against un-legitimate use of force against peaceful demonstrators in Brussels, during the demonstration against islamization.

MORE:
http://www.nysun.com/article/62393?page_no=2

http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article2950330.ece