Jihad : Who is the REAL ENEMY ?

Folks, I'se madder than a hornet. An' this here post is jes' stuff to share wif ya' from my recent readin'. Mostly it is about Jihad history and "terror".

(News flash: Since this post went up, I have had some emails finger pointin' at me fer not being kind to Muslims...folks who read this blog know that Aunty is no friend of Islam, but the muslims who suffer under it's sway is victims--most are poor and undereducated and they're bein' used by the wealthy educated Islamic puppet masters.)

I'se hoping ya'll will tell me what ya' think of this in terms of what we (the WEST) ought do now and fer the near future--mebbe for next 5 years or so.

First, lemme tell you how fire angry I gits wif' bookstores that are censorin' yore readin material, startin' wif Barnes and Noble, that cesspool of occult and ecofreakology. Try this: Go in ter B & N and jes' try to find Oriana Fallaci or Bat Ye'or. BArnes and Nobel doan have it and they'll be real snooty when they tells ya that.

If ya' ask to order it, why, they git a look on they faces like they smell sompin' putrid. Even Mark Steyn's great new America Alone was scarce.

I doan like Amazon on account of them tabulatin' yore key strokes, then they send you "suggestions" based on their profile of you--and they gits mah "profile" way wrong eve'r time. This is cause if you wanna check put what sort of books a certain vile person wrote, ter git a feel for how deep they's compromised, Amazon assumes you like that sorts trash. Ain't feedin' them no more info on my readin' choices.


Somehow, despite the bookstore jihad against truthful history of jihad, I got a copy of JIHAD by Paul Fregosi. Ya'll git one too...most comprehensive fer the non-scholar. I got the Fallaci and Bat Ye'or too and we needs ter read em' since iffin' things fall the wrong way, we gonna really need ter know our enemy. Ya knows we's on elevated alert at the moment?

A small digression: Aunty has has a fair number of trips to northern Spain. Them folks act like the Moors was there yesterday. Thas' how visceral their memories are of the terror of Muslim Spain.

SO, naturally Fregosi's book has a good chunk devoted to Spain, which will give you the same visceral reaction. ( Naturally, I'se asummin' youse read Bernard Lewis' books, ya'll being all high brow folks)

Next, I drive 'round listening to Robert Spencer's book on CD, The Truth About Mohammed.


Doan need to tell you that it is not possible to remain neutral on the matter of Islamic Jihad.

But here is good point: each time "negotiation" or "appeasement" or "diplomacy" fails--and it does--the recruiting rate for teenaged jihadi's skyrocket. They are so jazzed about your imminent demise that they whirl like dervishes jes' to belong to a cell group.


Lemme know how it is that the Frogs think that a ban on pork in soup for the homeless will hold off the terror in the Paris ghettos? See, what they doan wanna say out loud is that the homeless is basically Muslim immigrants.

The BBC reports that Russia is crackin' down on "immigrants" who come to the flea markets to sell stuff...but they won't say on BBC that these immigrants is Islamic.

We is victimized by our own Western Media--they want us in the dark--idea is so we won't panic, but ya'll, what is really the reason is so we won't demand better policy for the preservation of our culture.

Culture...here is an important realization, chickens, and it requires some deep thought. Public policy is not based on pragmatic responses to defined problems, but based more on what we intend ter say about ourselves. Jihad is public policy for Islam. Jihad doan solve NO problems fer their poor starving, ignorant, jobless muslims.

Ah, but it says EVER'THANG about what Islam wants ter say about itself.

And the key here, as compared to us'uns, is that they at least know who they is.


The West is divided--thanks to "enlightenment" philosophy and the modern media--into those who do have a sense of identity, and those who prefer to rewrite our heritage. They want to craft a global village (all the better for control and commerce my dear) and to do so means to pry you loose from yore prideful heritage.

See, iffin' you wanna hold on ter being a proud Scotsman, American, Spaniard, or Czech, why then you won't make a very good globalist.

War ain't pretty. Never was, and even techno advances won't make it Cinderella.

But we need to know some history of the meaning of the rise of European States. When Europe organized around sovereignty and a monarch, war was confined to state actors--more or less. Any free lance activity met a decisive blow from the king's men.

So think now--ya'll got any picture of what would happen if some free-lance cells from Poland or Ireland or Texas went in bidness fer themselves? Let's slam a series of IEDs on Syrian offices with a "Texas kilroy was here" label and them Syrians won't have ter lift a finger --why ?

Cause the wrath of Uncle Sam will do it fer them.

In reverse, it ain't that way. All these "non-state actors" from Egypt or Saudi Arabia or Pakistan....their kings or mullas or gubmint is CHEERIN' behind they beards. What a farce fer them to say that they cain't do nuthin' about it...and you can bet aunt Gertie's garter that every Euro and American leader KNOWS IT.

A key component to "terror" is its unpredictability. When yore scout rides hell fer leather to bring yore King the message that LeRoi and company is landin' an armada on your shores, you have a week to prepare. Ya cain't move armies by stealth. Terror has all these advantages: it is cheap--no need to feed and clothe an army; it permits denial of responsibility; it is effective.

* * *

Ever'body knows that we could crush jihad iffin' we had the will ter do so. We got the best toys. So what really is the problem?

Well, suppose youse fer a new order of thangs, a global world, a global society. A heap of folks see this idea as the next (final?) level of political evolution, even human evolution--ya know? Where we's all holdin' hands across the world and every baby belongs to everybody and nobody is anybody cause everybody is our body?

An along comes an old enemy--Islam--with his puny jabs ...ah, but the globalist sees a way ter use it..after all, the old enemy announces he will destroy western civ...and Globalists want to destroy western civ too--as an IDEA--but not its assets and resources or even its people....all they wanna do is destroy the identity of western civ so they can impose global citizenry on ever'body--fer the sake of peace, a'course....why not let Ahmed do it fer ya? When they's achieved what they want, they'll jes' vaporize Ahmed and boys.

This is ABSOLUTELY not to imply that the towers was an inside job--thas' idiocy. this is NOT to fan conspiracy fires that names GWB as part of a global hegemon. Nope...

What Aunty Belle is wonderin' is iffin a critcal mass of folks in universities, gubmint, politcs (Jimmy carter, John Kerry, Billary) , arts (Clooney, Baldwin, Streisand) media ( ted turner, ted koppel, dan rathergate) is already identifying with the global meme, they pressure for appeasement of Ahmed, and subvert efforts to use effective force against "terror" and mullahs and kings masquerading behind "non-state actors," they send cindy sheehan $$, they demand Gitmo be remodeled into the Taj Mahal......they admire poltroons like Chavez...they are so so-fist-icated, and "forward thinkin."

It is these folks who is our enemy. Youse seein' them aplenty at Barnes and Noble and Starbucks, in yore college classrooms, at the local art center, in yore offices.

Clear these buffoons outa the way, folks. Then lean on the domestic pressure points and demand the WEST use due force to clip Ahmed's vas deferens and git on with OUR lives.